<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sethu Ram – SEO Strategist &amp; AI Search Writer | WorthView</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.worthview.com/author/sethu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>There is something here for EVERYONE • Since 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 19:53:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>PHP2Shell Crisis: Which Major Websites Went Offline, and Why</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/php2shell-crisis-which-major-websites-went-offline-and-why/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/php2shell-crisis-which-major-websites-went-offline-and-why/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 19:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP2Shell]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Several government portals, educational institutions, and commercial websites went offline on October 21, 2026, as organizations rushed to respond to two critical security vulnerabilities in PHP, one of the internet&#8217;s most widely used programming languages. The vulnerabilities, collectively nicknamed PHP2Shell, prompted cybersecurity agencies to recommend immediate patching. Organizations that could</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/php2shell-crisis-which-major-websites-went-offline-and-why/">PHP2Shell Crisis: Which Major Websites Went Offline, and Why</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/php2shell-crisis-which-major-websites-went-offline-and-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHP2Shell Explained: What Happened, Who&#8217;s at Risk and What to Do</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/php2shell-explained-what-happened-whos-at-risk-and-what-to-do/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/php2shell-explained-what-happened-whos-at-risk-and-what-to-do/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP2Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PHP2Shell is a pair of critical flaws (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619) in the PHP language itself. They let an attacker run code on a web server without logging in. Both are rated 9.2 out of 10 (CVSS v4.0). Fixes shipped on 21 October 2026. What to do today: check your PHP</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/php2shell-explained-what-happened-whos-at-risk-and-what-to-do/">PHP2Shell Explained: What Happened, Who&#8217;s at Risk and What to Do</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/php2shell-explained-what-happened-whos-at-risk-and-what-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decision Models Explained: Jev vs Microsoft-Decision-1 vs OpenAI Decisions API</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/decision-models-explained-jev-vs-microsoft-decision-1-vs-openai-decisions-api/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/decision-models-explained-jev-vs-microsoft-decision-1-vs-openai-decisions-api/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openai]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Three decision models launched within four weeks: TypeSafe AI&#8217;s Jev on 15 September, OpenAI&#8217;s Decisions API in public beta on 6 October, and Microsoft-Decision-1 on 9 October. None of them writes text. Each takes an input plus a set of options and returns a probability for every option. Input costs</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/decision-models-explained-jev-vs-microsoft-decision-1-vs-openai-decisions-api/">Decision Models Explained: Jev vs Microsoft-Decision-1 vs OpenAI Decisions API</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/decision-models-explained-jev-vs-microsoft-decision-1-vs-openai-decisions-api/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Gemini Agent: Explained, Features, Use Cases, How to Use It</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/googles-gemini-agent-explained-features-use-cases-how-to-use-it/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/googles-gemini-agent-explained-features-use-cases-how-to-use-it/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gemini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gemini agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google gemini]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AI tools can already answer questions, write emails, summarize documents, and generate code. But what if an AI tool could also take a task, work through the steps, use different applications, and prepare the final result? That is the idea behind Google&#8217;s Gemini Agent, announced at Gemini at Work 2026</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/googles-gemini-agent-explained-features-use-cases-how-to-use-it/">Google&#8217;s Gemini Agent: Explained, Features, Use Cases, How to Use It</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/googles-gemini-agent-explained-features-use-cases-how-to-use-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI Is Moving Toward Superintelligence: How to Secure Your .si Domain Now</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/ai-is-moving-toward-superintelligence-how-to-secure-your-si-domain-now/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/ai-is-moving-toward-superintelligence-how-to-secure-your-si-domain-now/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 19:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain flipping]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The AI landscape may be entering a new naming era — and an unexpected two-letter domain extension is already seeing a massive surge in registrations. In September 2026, 46,066 new .si domains were registered, compared with just 3,515 in August. The official Slovenian domain registry, Register.si, is now showing more</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/ai-is-moving-toward-superintelligence-how-to-secure-your-si-domain-now/">AI Is Moving Toward Superintelligence: How to Secure Your .si Domain Now</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/ai-is-moving-toward-superintelligence-how-to-secure-your-si-domain-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5: Which Should You Use for Each Job?</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-sonnet-5-5-which-should-you-use-for-each-job/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-sonnet-5-5-which-should-you-use-for-each-job/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 03:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude Sonnet 5.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haiku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haiku 5.5]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59328</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Use Claude Haiku 5.5 for narrow, high-volume jobs whose output you can check cheaply, such as classification, extraction, summaries, routing and subagent lookups. It costs 20 times less per token than Sonnet 5.5 on prompts up to 100,000 tokens. Keep Sonnet 5.5 (or Opus 5.5) for complex agentic coding and</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-sonnet-5-5-which-should-you-use-for-each-job/">Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5: Which Should You Use for Each Job?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-sonnet-5-5-which-should-you-use-for-each-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthropic Opens Claude Startups to Bootstrapped Founders: What India&#8217;s Builders Get</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/anthropic-opens-claude-startups-to-bootstrapped-founders-what-indias-builders-get/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/anthropic-opens-claude-startups-to-bootstrapped-founders-what-indias-builders-get/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 19:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claude]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59304</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Anthropic has opened its Claude Startups program to a much wider pool of founders, and bootstrapped companies no longer need a venture investor to qualify. Announced on October 6, the expanded program offers approved startups $1,000 in Claude API credits, a free year of Claude Team, and discounts from partner</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/anthropic-opens-claude-startups-to-bootstrapped-founders-what-indias-builders-get/">Anthropic Opens Claude Startups to Bootstrapped Founders: What India&#8217;s Builders Get</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/anthropic-opens-claude-startups-to-bootstrapped-founders-what-indias-builders-get/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenAI to Add Invisible Watermarks to ChatGPT Text in the EU: What It Means</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/openai-to-add-invisible-watermarks-to-chatgpt-text-in-the-eu-what-it-means/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/openai-to-add-invisible-watermarks-to-chatgpt-text-in-the-eu-what-it-means/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 11:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chatgpt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openai]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>OpenAI is preparing to add invisible watermarks to text generated by ChatGPT and Codex for users in the European Union, as the company responds to new AI transparency requirements under the EU AI Act. Unlike a traditional watermark, users will not see any symbols, labels, special characters or hidden spaces</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/openai-to-add-invisible-watermarks-to-chatgpt-text-in-the-eu-what-it-means/">OpenAI to Add Invisible Watermarks to ChatGPT Text in the EU: What It Means</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/openai-to-add-invisible-watermarks-to-chatgpt-text-in-the-eu-what-it-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gemini 4 Argon Explained: Google’s New AI Model Built for Complex Agentic Workflows</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/gemini-4-argon-explained-googles-new-ai-model-built-for-complex-agentic-workflows/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/gemini-4-argon-explained-googles-new-ai-model-built-for-complex-agentic-workflows/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 04:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gemini Argon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google ai]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AI assistants have become good at answering questions, writing content, generating code and analyzing information. But the next step in AI is moving beyond individual responses toward systems that can work through complex tasks over much longer periods. That is the direction Google is taking with Gemini 4 Argon, its</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/gemini-4-argon-explained-googles-new-ai-model-built-for-complex-agentic-workflows/">Gemini 4 Argon Explained: Google’s New AI Model Built for Complex Agentic Workflows</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/gemini-4-argon-explained-googles-new-ai-model-built-for-complex-agentic-workflows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manus Cue vs OpenAI Dots vs Meta Muse: AI Agent Comparison</title>
		<link>https://www.worthview.com/manus-cue-vs-openai-dots-vs-meta-muse-ai-agent-comparison/</link>
					<comments>https://www.worthview.com/manus-cue-vs-openai-dots-vs-meta-muse-ai-agent-comparison/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sethuram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manus Cue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta muse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openai dots]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.worthview.com/?p=59205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AI agents are moving beyond chat. Manus Cue, OpenAI Dots and Meta Muse are three of the newest attempts to create AI agents that can keep working after you close the app, use connected tools, interact with websites and services, and complete tasks with varying levels of autonomy. The three</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.worthview.com/manus-cue-vs-openai-dots-vs-meta-muse-ai-agent-comparison/">Manus Cue vs OpenAI Dots vs Meta Muse: AI Agent Comparison</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.worthview.com">WorthvieW</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.worthview.com/manus-cue-vs-openai-dots-vs-meta-muse-ai-agent-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
